A Recap and Reflection on Outrage Overload
Overcoming perpetual outrage, lowering the temperature
By David Beckemeyer and Austin Chen
Introduction
Over the past six months, the Outrage Overload podcast has examined the complex world of political polarization and the outrage industry. With over 30 episodes released, it is time to take a step back and reflect on the key themes and takeaways from the show. In this article, we will explore the insights shared by experts and guests, providing a comprehensive analysis of the implications and potential impact of these themes. From the foundational concept of outrage to the role of media and the importance of personal reflection, we will look into the heart of the podcast's mission: to understand and navigate the divisive landscape of modern politics.
The Foundation: Outrage and Political Sectarianism
One of the foundational episodes of the podcast was the discussion on political sectarianism with Peter Ditto (ep 1,2). This episode shed light on the role of outrage in our current political climate. It highlighted how political sectarianism is driven by moral superiority, making it difficult for individuals to find common ground and engage in productive dialogue. As Austin Chen aptly put it, "Instead of being able to agree to disagree, suddenly you can't even do that because you think that my side believes in XYZ, therefore, I'm on some sort of moral high ground."
The episode with Ritsaart Reimann (ep 13) touched upon the negative bias inherent in the English language. As David mentioned, "It's not just that focusing on the outrage, focusing on the negatives is entertaining, it's just so much easier for these people to do." The language we use shapes our perception of the world, and the prevalence of negative language in our discourse contributes to the polarization and animosity we see today.
The Outrage Industry: Incentives and Manipulation
The discussion on the outrage industry with Jeffrey Berry (ep 7) provided valuable insights into the mechanisms behind the perpetuation of outrage. Berry's book, "Outrage Industry," explores how various players, including social media platforms and news media, leverage outrage to their advantage. As David noted, "It's a vicious cycle. We get agitated, we want to do it more, that makes them want to do it more, and it just keeps heating up this whole environment."
This episode also highlighted the role of social media in amplifying outrage. Austin Chen pointed out that with the rise of social media, everyone can become a content creator and reach a significant number of people. This proliferation of voices has exacerbated the problem of political polarization, as partisan newsrooms are no longer the sole contributors to the outrage industry. The democratization of media has led to a saturation of outrage-driven content, making it difficult to discern fact from fiction.
Navigating the Landscape: Dialogue and Understanding
While the podcast explores the complexities of the outrage industry, it also offers hope for bridging the divide. The episode featuring Steven Rathje (ep 8,9) emphasized the importance of dialogue and understanding. Rathje highlighted the need for a movement to lower the temperature and encourage productive conversations. As David mentioned, "We have to lower this temperature so we can have those dialogues in a productive way because right now it's just not possible."
The podcast also explored strategies for engaging in meaningful conversations with individuals who hold differing views. Austin Chen highlighted the importance of active listening and asking exploratory questions. By seeking to understand the underlying motivations and concerns of others, we can foster a more empathetic and productive dialogue. As Austin noted, "Rather than just taking what they're saying at face value, what do those words actually mean individually? Is there a message underneath that perhaps they're trying to convey?"
The Power of Personal Reflection and Media Literacy
Throughout the podcast, the importance of personal reflection and media literacy emerged as key themes. The episode featuring Alex Korb (ep 10) described the concept of self-reflection and the need to understand our own biases and motivations. Korb emphasized the importance of developing a fully formed moral compass and critically evaluating the sources of our beliefs.
Media literacy was another recurring theme, with several guests highlighting the need to critically evaluate the information we consume. David stressed the importance of seeking out credible sources and avoiding the pitfalls of partisan media (Lawrence Eppard, ep 14). He noted, "Identifying what a better source is can be a little challenging, but there are tools out there to see what's more credible."
Conclusion and Future Outlook
The Outrage Overload podcast has provided a platform for exploring the complexities of political polarization and the outrage industry. By engaging with experts and delving into the nuances of these issues, the podcast offers valuable insights and strategies for navigating the divisive landscape of modern politics.
Moving forward, the podcast aims to continue its mission of fostering understanding and dialogue. By focusing on the micro-level, from personal reflection to engaging in meaningful conversations, the podcast seeks to empower individuals to make a difference in their own lives and communities. As David mentioned, "Start small, be the small changes from there."
The future of the podcast holds exciting possibilities, with more episodes featuring experts in bridge-building and strategies for productive dialogue. By amplifying these voices and encouraging listeners to engage with diverse perspectives, the podcast aims to contribute to a more informed and empathetic society.
In conclusion, the Outrage Overload podcast serves as a valuable resource for those seeking to understand and navigate the complexities of political polarization. By exploring the foundations of outrage, the role of the outrage industry, and strategies for dialogue and understanding, the podcast offers a comprehensive analysis of the challenges and potential solutions. As listeners engage with the content and reflect on their own beliefs and biases, they can contribute to a more informed and compassionate society.
What do you think?
New This Week in Outrage Episode!
It’s everything the Outrage Overload podcast is not. It’s not edited. It’s not scripted. It’s lightly researched. It’s David and Lisa talking about this week in outrage, what was in the news, in the memes, and maybe finding some backstory with a humorous (at least to us) twist.
New! You can also now listen live online on Yergz Radio Sundays 4:30PM Pacific / 7:30PM Eastern.
Lisa is not impressed with Shapes🔶🟥🔵 - 10/22/2023
Listen now (63 mins) | This week, Lisa and David talk about the upcoming Recap episode on Outrage Overload; college hoops are coming up; new things in the Olympics, but still no rugby; Lululemon to join the S&P 500; Adderall shortage (Because Adderall is designated a Sched…
Take the Pew Research Political Typology Quiz!
I was surprised by my result. You may be surprised by yours too. The options are sometimes quite black and white, but Pew knows more about this stuff than I do. As they suggest, pick the answer that comes the closest to your view, from the available choices, even if it isn't exactly right. Share if you'd like, but remember your result so you can play along later.