Left Bias in Academia with Dr. Lawrence Eppard
Challenges of Ideological Conformity in Higher Education
Conservative media often criticizes academia for its alleged left-leaning bias. They argue that colleges and universities are dominated by liberal ideologies, leading to a lack of diversity of thought and a stifling of conservative viewpoints. However, is this portrayal accurate? Are academics truly indoctrinating students with their political beliefs?
Political science professor David Corbin challenges this popular narrative, asserting that most researchers, regardless of their political leanings, do not have an agenda to indoctrinate students. He argues that while certain disciplines may have a left-leaning intellectual content, most professors strive to be open to competing viewpoints. Sociology professor Neil Gross supports this view, stating that most professors are focused on teaching the content of their fields rather than pushing a political agenda.
However, the data does indicate that the professoriate is predominantly liberal, with the social sciences and humanities being the most left-leaning fields. This has led to concerns about intellectual diversity and the exclusion of conservative perspectives in academia. Lawrence Eppard, a professor and author, highlights the growing disparity in ideological representation, with studies showing a significant skew towards the left in fields such as psychology and sociology.
Challenges Faced by Academics
The issue of bias in academia extends beyond the perception of left-leaning ideologies. Academics who challenge the prevailing orthodoxy or present findings that go against the grain often face reputational harm and professional consequences. Eppard shares his personal experiences and those of his colleagues, highlighting the pressure to conform and the potential backlash for questioning established beliefs.
One example provided is the study on perceptions of backsliding on democracy. The researchers found that Democrats and Republicans had similar levels of concern about the other side's potential for backsliding. However, they faced criticism and pushback for their findings, as it challenged the prevailing narrative that one side was more prone to undermining democracy than the other.
Eppard discusses the challenges of discussing sensitive topics such as race and crime. He emphasizes the importance of addressing the complex factors that contribute to racial disparities, including community inequalities and family structure. However, even broaching these subjects can be met with resistance and accusations of racism or victim-blaming.
Efforts to Improve the Situation
Recognizing the need for change, academia has taken steps to address bias and promote transparency. One significant development is the push for researchers to make their data publicly available, increasing accountability and allowing for greater scrutiny of findings. The adoption of pre-registration, where researchers outline their hypotheses and methods before conducting a study, also helps mitigate the issue of changing hypotheses mid-study.
However, there are still challenges to overcome. Replication studies, which are crucial for verifying the validity of research findings, often face obstacles in publication and funding. The emphasis on groundbreaking research and the lack of career rewards for replication studies hinder the progress towards a more robust and reliable body of knowledge.
Eppard suggests several potential solutions, including diversifying the gatekeepers at journals, making reviews public, and providing financial incentives for reviewers. These measures aim to promote intellectual diversity and ensure that research undergoes rigorous scrutiny from a variety of perspectives.
I hope you check out this episode and send me your thoughts.
David Beckemeyer
Host and Creator of the Outrage Overload podcast
Enjoyed this content? Buy me a coffee.
Your support helps me continue creating helpful and informative content for you. With your contribution, I can invest in better equipment, software, and resources to enhance my work, and keep the show ad-free. Every little bit counts, so if you find the podcast valuable, please consider making a small donation.
Thank you for your generosity!